Feature Requests

Many sites can have multiple different URLs for login and usage. Password managers like 1Password and Bitwarden allow associating a password with multiple URLs for auto completion and filtering. Adding the ability to have multiple URLs stored in a password record would be very helpful.

For security reasons, is it possible that the admin and super-admins roles are not subject to licensing and only have access to the administration part (no customers, no KB, etc.)? This would allow to have the user accounts on the one hand, and the administration accounts of the solution on the other. It may be necessary to have a new “manager” role that would allow a user to have the functions of archiving, portal management/associated users and other functions that are now reserved for admins. I know that this requires a global redesign of the tool, but I think it's worth considering:).

Currently there is no way to adjust the frequency of how alert emails are generated from Hudu when monitoring SSL/Domain expiration's. This causes a lot of extra tickets to be created in ticket systems for emails generated from Hudu. It would be beneficial to be able to configure the alerts to only generate once, or only generate once at 30 days, once at 15 days, once at 5 days etc.

Track Changes in Activity Logs for processes and process templates. Requested features: Log when a Process Template or Process is created. Log any updates made to existing Process Templates or Processes. Log when a Process Template or Process is deleted. Allow filtering/searching for Process-related logs in the Activity Logs section.

Allow Admins to be part of groups We have different departments which we want to restrict users' access to. This is impossible for us to do as some people are in multiple groups. So please Allow groups to allow access to certain areas, instead of just denying them and allow users to be added to multiple groups. Button that allows you to search and select multiple users in the company. And button to select all users.

To conform to ISO27001 standards we require newly created or edited KB Articles to go through an approval process. Currently we have no way of creating a workflow for review and approval/decline of newly created or edited KB Articles. A simple feature to automatically tag an article as “review neccesary” with a notification sent to a certain group of users (HUDU Admins) would suffice. Please consider including this feature in your product, since there are most likely other companies using your platform in need of this feature.

Currently, there is no way to track creations, updates, and deletions of global and company process templates, including their tasks and descriptions. This makes it difficult to monitor changes and maintain accountability. Audit Logs for Process Templates Track when a process template is created, updated, or deleted. Include who made the change and a timestamp. Task-Level Tracking Log changes to individual tasks within a process template. Capture edits to task descriptions, due dates, and assignments. Historical Versioning Store previous versions of templates to allow rollback or review of changes. User Permissions & Notifications Allow admins to control who can modify templates. Optional email or in-app alerts when a template is changed. Use Cases: Security & Compliance – Helps track unauthorized or accidental changes. Team Collaboration – Provides transparency on who updated what and when. Process Integrity – Ensures consistency in workflows across organizations.

The built in security groups are decent, but we would really benefit with a way to lock down certain components "write" access, such as the "Overview" section, specific KB folders (similar to how Passwords have group access permissions), and/or People having a global section vs client specific.

It would be good to be able to separate the activity log permissions from the admin access. Some people should be able to review logs, but still not have full admin access to everything.

I think that the change to certain security measures should trigger an alert to a designated email. So if an admin changes the permissions of any users or groups an alert is triggered. Additionally, I think that admins (not super admins) should not be able to edit their own group permissions. I have admins that have permissions to change and manage as they see fit. But that doesn't mean that I want them to have access to every company or even internal documentation.