Custom user role creation for more granular permissions control
R
Representative Peacock
There are only 6 roles available. However, I would like to be able to break it out more granularly. For example be able to create a role that can create/update/flag documentation, but not share. Allowing custom role creations would likely satisfy a few feature quests here by getting the permissions broken down more granularly and allowing us to choose which permission get applied to the custom role.
Kristen W.
Merged in a post:
Custom User Permissions
R
Rose quartz Lark
The built in security groups are decent, but we would really benefit with a way to lock down certain components "write" access, such as the "Overview" section, specific KB folders (similar to how Passwords have group access permissions), and/or People having a global section vs client specific.
Photo Viewer
View photos in a modal
A
Active Jellyfish
Not thrilled to see this has been on the docket for nearly 5 years now, with no actual action on it. This seems like a wild oversight
S
Specified Planarian
This also goes for the API,we need the ability to restrict the keys to specific endpoints and methods.
B
Bastille Finch
We really need this ASAP. I need our techs to create/update processes, but there's no way they should be admins.
R
Rose quartz Lark
Allowing password / KB folder creation for an editor role would be great!
H
Hidden Tyrannosaurus
Rose quartz Lark I agree. Need custom role where we can specify whats allowed each as folder creation for editor role.
L
Lemon glacier Cricket
+1.
Had a user somehow accidentally edit the name of a company, only way we were able to find it is the linked company from the PSA integration, couldn't find any data on the old company name in activity log search and where the name got updated it only showed "updated"
Did not show like "Company Updated", something that if we were searching through logs would make easier to see
Z
Zaffre blue Perch
+1
Roles with detailed permissions are urgently needed. We need users who can create and update global process templates, but do not have permission to delete.
C
Creative Kangaroo
Yes up-vote +1. Like Keppel green Sloth says, can't even properly maintain a rack layout unless you have full admin and that doesn't allow for following least privilege setup if everyone has to be an admin.
N
Nougat Tortoise
Absolutely a killer feature. Much needed
K
Keppel green Sloth
I too wish the permissions were more granular. In my case I want to allow some users to import and delete assets or passwords. The way it stands Editors can build a Rack but then cannot remove an Asset that they themselves assigned to the Rack.
Load More
→